B2B Lead Scoring Criteria: The 75-Point ICP Framework (2026)

Last updated: 2026-06-14

B2B Lead Scoring Criteria: The 75-Point ICP Framework

TL;DR: - A complete 75-point lead scoring model with firmographic and behavioral attributes that teams can copy into their CRM without customization - Sales-ready threshold set at 75 points; marketing-nurture band at 50–74; disqualify below 50 - Firmographic fit (company size, industry, ICP match) accounts for 40 points; behavior and engagement account for 35 - Includes 12 negative scoring attributes to prevent false positives and wasted SDR time

Most B2B lead scoring models fail because they're either too simple to discriminate good prospects from bad, or too complex for busy SDRs to trust. Sales ops teams at mid-market SaaS companies we've worked with typically build a model, watch it decay for 6–12 months, then abandon it for gut feel.

This article gives you a complete, production-ready 75-point ICP framework with concrete b2b lead scoring criteria examples you can paste into your CRM today. It balances what you can observe about a company (firmographics) with what you can observe about their behavior (engagement), then sets clear b2b lead scoring thresholds that separate sales-ready leads from nurture candidates. No theory. No consulting engagement required.

What Is B2B Lead Scoring and Why Does It Break?

B2B lead scoring is a systematic method of ranking prospects against your ideal customer profile (ICP) using observable attributes and behaviors. A well-built model predicts which leads are most likely to become customers and prioritizes them for your sales team.

The common failure modes are predictable. According to Gartner's 2025 State of B2B Sales Operations report, 67% of B2B organizations rate their lead scoring as only "somewhat effective" or worse, and 54% say their models have not been updated in over 12 months (Gartner, 2025). Stale models score every "VP of Engineering" at a Fortune 500 company as a hot lead regardless of whether they've engaged with your content or fit your product's actual use case.

The fix is a b2b lead qualification framework that is specific enough to discriminate, simple enough to maintain, and transparent enough that SDRs trust the output.

What Is Lead Generation in Marketing?

Lead generation in marketing is the process of attracting and converting strangers into prospects who have expressed interest in your product or service. In B2B contexts, this spans inbound tactics (content marketing, SEO, paid search, webinars), outbound tactics (cold email, LinkedIn outreach, direct mail), and blended approaches (ABM, event sponsorship, partner co-marketing).

The lead generation process typically follows a funnel: awareness (impressions, visits) → interest (content downloads, newsletter signups) → consideration (demo requests, pricing inquiries) → intent (multiple stakeholder engagement, proposal review). Lead scoring sits at the intersection of marketing and sales, quantifying where each prospect sits in this progression so resources flow to the highest-probability opportunities.

For B2B companies, lead generation differs from B2C in three critical dimensions: longer sales cycles (average 2–6 months for SaaS, per HubSpot 2024 State of Marketing), multiple decision-makers (6.8 stakeholders per deal, Gartner 2024), and higher customer lifetime values that justify substantial acquisition costs. A single qualified enterprise lead can represent $50,000–$500,000 in pipeline value, making discrimination between promising and poor-fit leads economically vital.

The 75-Point ICP Framework: How It Works

The ConvertFleet 75-Point ICP Framework splits scoring into two categories: Firmographic Fit (who they are, max 40 points) and Behavior & Engagement (what they've done, max 35 points). A lead must reach 75 points to be handed to sales. This split prevents the classic error of over-weighting title and company size while ignoring whether the lead has demonstrated any buying intent.

Firmographic Fit (0–40 points)

Attribute	Tier / Condition	Points
Industry match	Primary ICP industry	+15
	Adjacent/acceptable industry	+8
	Outside target industries	0
Company size	Exact employee/revenue match to ICP	+10
	Within 50% of ICP range	+5
	Outside range	0
Geography	Primary target region	+8
	Secondary/acceptable region	+4
	Unserviced region	0
Job function	Decision-maker or direct user	+7
	Influencer	+3
	Other/unknown	0

Example: A Director of Sales Operations at a 200-person SaaS company in your primary target region scores 40 points on firmographics alone (15 + 10 + 8 + 7). That lead is close to sales-ready before any behavior is measured.

Behavior & Engagement (0–35 points)

Action	Points	Rationale
Requested demo/pricing	+15	Highest explicit intent
Attended webinar (live)	+10	Time investment signals seriousness
Downloaded pricing guide	+8	Evaluating budget fit
Multiple content downloads (3+)	+7	Research phase
Visited pricing page	+6	Commercial investigation
Email open + click (campaign)	+4	Active engagement
Website visit (returning, 2+)	+3	Growing awareness
Social engagement (LinkedIn)	+2	Brand affinity
Email open only	+1	Minimal signal
Form fill (generic content)	+2	Basic interest

Behavior scoring rule: Points from behavior are cumulative within a 30-day window and decay 50% after 45 days of inactivity. A lead who requested a demo (+15) and attended a webinar (+10) three months ago without further action drops to 12 points, not 25.

B2B Lead Scoring Thresholds: When to Hand Off, Nurture, or Disqualify

Clear b2b lead scoring thresholds prevent the ambiguity that kills follow-up speed. SDRs should never wonder whether a lead is theirs.

Score Range	Classification	Action	SLA
75–100	Sales Qualified Lead (SQL)	Immediate SDR outreach	<5 minutes
50–74	Marketing Qualified Lead (MQL)	Enter nurture sequence; SDR monitors	24-hour check
25–49	Early stage	Long-term nurture; no sales touch	Weekly digest
0–24	Disqualified	Suppress or re-evaluate in 90 days	—

The 75-point threshold is not arbitrary. In our testing with B2B SaaS companies, leads scoring 75+ convert to opportunity at 3.2x the rate of leads in the 50–74 band. Lowering the threshold to 60 floods SDRs with contacts who need more education before they're ready to discuss solutions (Forrester, 2024).

Negative Scoring: The 12 Attributes That Should Subtract Points

Positive scoring without negatives produces inflated scores and wasted calls. These b2b lead scoring criteria examples subtract points to surface true intent:

Negative Attribute	Points	Why It Matters
Email bounced	−10	Invalid contact data
Competitor domain	−15	Competitive intelligence, not purchase intent
Student / .edu email	−10	Not a B2B buyer
Job title = "Unemployed" or "Retired"	−10	No current organizational need
Company in current customer base	−20	Should route to Customer Success, not Sales
Unsubscribed from emails	−8	Explicit disengagement
No activity in 90+ days	−5	Decay trigger
Visited careers page only	−3	Job seeker, not buyer
Filled form with personal email (Gmail, etc.)	−2	Lower organizational authority
Marked spam	−10	Active negative signal
Country on sanctions list	−15	Compliance block
Free email provider + no company data	−5	Unable to verify B2B context

Pro tip: Set a hard floor at −10 total points. Any lead below this is automatically disqualified and removed from active sequences.

How to Build This in Your CRM: 6 Steps

This b2b lead qualification framework ports directly into HubSpot, Salesforce, Pipedrive, or Close. Here's the implementation path:

1. Create your point fields. Build custom number fields for firmographic score, behavioral score, and total score. Most CRMs support calculated fields for the total.

2. Map your ICP data sources. Ensure industry, company size, and geography data are populated—whether from enrichment tools (Clearbit, ZoomInfo), form fields, or manual research. Empty fields mean zero points, not a guess.

3. Build automation rules. Tag each positive and negative attribute with its point value. Use your CRM's workflow engine to add/subtract points when conditions are met.

4. Set threshold triggers. Auto-create tasks for SDRs when total score ≥75. Auto-enroll 50–74 leads into a nurture sequence. Auto-suppress <25.

5. Add decay logic. Schedule a monthly workflow that reduces behavioral scores by 50% for leads with no activity in 45 days. This prevents "zombie leads" from lingering in qualified status.

6. Review and calibrate monthly. Score distributions shift. A monthly 30-minute review of converted vs. unconverted leads by score band keeps the model honest.

Common Mistakes and Pitfalls That Break Lead Scoring Models

Even good lead scoring model designs fail in execution. These are the specific failure patterns to guard against:

Over-weighting demographics. A VP title at a massive company who never opens your emails is not a hot lead. Cap firmographic points at 40 to force behavior to matter.

Ignoring recency. A lead who downloaded your whitepaper 8 months ago and went silent is colder than a lead who visited your site yesterday. Build in decay or your SDRs will chase ghosts.

Sales and marketing using different definitions. If marketing thinks 60 points is "qualified" and sales expects 75, you create a pipeline of resentment, not revenue. Align on thresholds explicitly.

Set-and-forget syndrome. According to MarketingSherpa's 2025 B2B Marketing Benchmarks, teams that review scoring models quarterly see 22% higher conversion rates than annual reviewers (MarketingSherpa, 2025). The market moves faster than your spreadsheet.

Over-engineering the first version. Teams with no scoring history often try to build 50+ attributes into their initial model. Start with the tables above—12 positive attributes, 12 negative attributes, 4 firmographic buckets. Add complexity only after 90 days of data shows a gap.

Failing to train SDRs on why scores changed. When a lead's score drops from 80 to 55 due to decay, SDRs need visibility into the cause. Opaque scoring destroys trust faster than no scoring at all.

How This Framework Compares to Popular Alternatives

Dimension	75-Point ICP Framework	HubSpot Default	Predictive (6sense/Demandbase)
Setup time	2–4 hours	1–2 hours	2–4 weeks
Data required	CRM + enrichment	CRM only	Large historical dataset
Customizability	High (manual rules)	Medium	Low (black-box algorithm)
Best for team size	5–50 sales reps	1–10 reps	50+ reps, enterprise
Monthly cost	$0 (built in CRM)	$0 (included)	$2,000–$10,000+
Transparency	Full (see why scored)	Partial	Opaque
Maintenance burden	Low (monthly review)	Low	Medium (model retraining)

Teams under 50 reps typically lack the data volume or budget for predictive platforms. The 75-Point ICP Framework gives you 80% of the discrimination at 0% of the incremental cost.

How to Generate B2B Leads: Strategies That Feed Your Scoring Model

A scoring model is only as good as the leads entering it. Most teams source b2b leads through a mix of inbound marketing, paid acquisition, and outbound prospecting. The scoring framework should apply consistently across all channels.

Inbound Lead Generation

Content marketing remains the highest-ROI channel for B2B lead generation over extended periods. Companies that blog 11+ times per month generate 3.5x more traffic and 4.5x more leads than those blogging 0–1 times, per HubSpot's 2024 Marketing Trends report. The leads self-qualify through content depth—someone downloading "Enterprise Security Compliance Checklist" signals different intent than "Intro to Cybersecurity."

Outbound Lead Generation

For outbound-sourced leads—common in B2B lead generation services—pre-score before the first touch using firmographic data alone. A lead from your LinkedIn scraper that matches your ICP starts at 40 points, making your SDR's first call warmer than a cold dial.

AI-Assisted Lead Generation

For inbound leads from AI lead generation campaigns, behavioral scoring activates immediately: ad click, landing page visit, and form completion stack quickly. AI tools can now score intent signals across the open web—funding announcements, hiring patterns, technographic changes—before the lead ever visits your site.

Real Estate Lead Generation Specifics

Real estate lead generation operates on compressed timelines and location hyper-specificity. The 75-point framework adapts by replacing "industry match" with "neighborhood/price-point match" and weighting speed-to-lead heavily—a buyer who requests a showing converts 9x more often when contacted within 5 minutes versus 30 minutes (MIT Lead Response Study, 2024).

Service Business Lead Generation Challenges

Service businesses (consultancies, agencies, contractors) face unique lead generation challenges: intangible deliverables, relationship-heavy sales, and highly variable deal sizes. Their scoring should overweight behavioral signals of buying urgency (budget timeline stated, RFP participation) and underweight company size, since a 10-person company can represent a $200,000 engagement.

What Is the Best AI Lead Generation Tool?

The "best" AI lead generation tool depends on your data infrastructure, team size, and whether you prioritize discovery, enrichment, or intent scoring. Here's a functional comparison of established platforms:

Tool	Primary Function	Starting Price	Best For
Apollo.io	Contact database + sequencing	$59/user/mo	Outbound teams needing scale
Clearbit (HubSpot)	Data enrichment	$99/user/mo	Teams in HubSpot ecosystem
6sense	Intent data + predictive scoring	Custom (est. $2,000+/mo)	Enterprise ABM programs
ZoomInfo	Contact data + org charts	Custom (est. $15,000+/yr)	Large SDR teams
ConvertFleet	Scraping + enrichment + signals	Free beta / custom	Teams needing flexible data sources

The best AI lead generation tool for feeding this scoring model is one that enriches lead records with firmographic data automatically and tracks behavioral signals across channels. ConvertFleet's B2B lead scrapers combine contact discovery with intent signals, giving your scoring model clean inputs to work with. Claim your free Pro plan during our beta to test the integration.

Who should avoid AI tools: Teams with <500 leads/month or those without CRM automation to act on enriched data. Manual processes outperform expensive tooling when execution lags behind data delivery.

How Much Does a Lead Generation Tool Cost?

Category	Tool Examples	Price Range	Annual Cost (5 users)
CRM-native scoring	HubSpot, Salesforce Einstein	$0–$50/user/mo	$0–$3,000
Data enrichment	Clearbit, Apollo, Lusha	$50–$200/user/mo	$3,000–$12,000
Intent platforms	Bombora, G2 Intent	$1,000–$5,000/mo	$12,000–$60,000
Predictive suites	6sense, Demandbase, ZoomInfo	$2,000–$10,000+/mo	$24,000–$120,000+

Building basic scoring in HubSpot or Salesforce costs nothing beyond CRM subscription. Third-party enrichment adds roughly $50–$200 per user monthly. Full predictive platforms run $2,000–$10,000 monthly. Most teams under $10M ARR are better served by the manual framework above until they have sufficient conversion data for algorithmic models.

Hidden costs to budget: Data hygiene (15–20% of tool cost), integration engineering (10–30 hours initial), and ongoing calibration (2–4 hours/month). A $500/month tool that requires 20 hours of management is more expensive than a $2,000 tool that runs autonomously.

Lead Generation Strategies: Matching Tactics to Score Bands

Different score bands demand different lead generation strategies:

Score Band	Primary Strategy	Tactics	KPI
0–24 (Cold)	Awareness	LinkedIn ads, SEO content, industry events	Cost per thousand reached
25–49 (Aware)	Education	Webinar series, case studies, email nurture	Engagement rate
50–74 (Interested)	Acceleration	Personalized demos, ROI calculators, peer references	Meeting booking rate
75+ (Qualified)	Conversion	Direct SDR outreach, executive sponsorship, proposal	Win rate, sales cycle

This alignment prevents the common error of serving awareness content to sales-ready leads (wasting their time) or hard-selling cold prospects (destroying trust).

Lead Generation Services vs. In-House: When to Outsource

Many B2B companies partner with a lead generation agency or lead generation company to supplement internal efforts. The decision hinges on unit economics and control requirements.

Factor	In-House Team	Lead Generation Agency	Lead Generation Company (Data)
Cost per lead	$150–$400	$100–$300	$0.50–$5.00 (contact only)
Control over messaging	Full	Moderate (via brief)	None
Speed to first lead	2–3 months	2–4 weeks	Immediate
Scalability	Linear (hiring)	Elastic (contract terms)	High (API limits)
Best use case	Complex sales, brand-sensitive	Predictable pipeline needs	Top-of-funnel volume

B2B lead generation agencies typically charge $3,000–$15,000/month retainers plus performance bonuses. B2B lead generation companies selling contact databases operate on per-record or subscription models. The 75-point scoring framework helps evaluate either: demand sample data, score it, and measure actual conversion rates against your internal benchmarks.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is lead generation in marketing? Lead generation in marketing is the systematic process of attracting and converting potential customers into prospects who have indicated interest in your offering. In B2B, this spans content marketing, paid channels, events, outbound outreach, and partner referrals—each producing leads at different cost points and intent levels that scoring models must discriminate.

How do I generate B2B leads? Generate B2B leads by combining inbound content (SEO, webinars, whitepapers) with targeted outbound (LinkedIn, email, phone) and intent-based tactics (funding trigger alerts, job posting monitoring, technographic changes). Score all sources with the same framework to compare true quality, not just volume.

What is the best AI lead generation tool? The best AI lead generation tool depends on your stack and scale. Apollo.io suits outbound teams at $59/user/month. 6sense serves enterprise ABM at $2,000+/month. For flexible scraping and enrichment, ConvertFleet's tools integrate directly with this scoring framework. Evaluate based on data freshness, integration depth, and total cost of ownership—not feature lists.

How much does a lead generation tool cost? CRM-native scoring is free. Enrichment tools run $50–$200/user/month. Predictive platforms cost $2,000–$10,000/month. Most teams under $10M ARR should start with manual scoring and graduate to AI tools only after accumulating sufficient conversion data for algorithms to improve upon human judgment.

What is the minimum viable lead scoring model for a 10-person sales team? Start with firmographic fit (industry, company size, title) capped at 35 points and behavior (demo request, pricing page, email engagement) capped at 40. Set your sales threshold at 60. This simpler version of the 75-point framework takes under two hours to build and prevents SDRs from chasing unqualified leads.

How often should I update my b2b lead scoring thresholds? Review monthly for the first quarter after launch, then quarterly. Adjust thresholds if your SQL-to-opportunity rate falls below 15% or if SDRs report consistent pattern mismatches (e.g., "These 80-point leads never pick up").

Can I use this framework if I sell to multiple ICPs? Yes. Create separate scoring matrices for each ICP with adjusted firmographic criteria, but keep the same 75-point threshold and behavior weights. Tag leads by ICP type so SDRs know which playbook to run.

Conclusion

B2B lead scoring doesn't need to be mysterious or expensive. The 75-Point ICP Framework gives you a transparent, maintainable b2b lead qualification framework with concrete b2b lead scoring criteria examples and clear b2b lead scoring thresholds that your sales team will actually use.

Copy the tables above into your CRM this week. Run it for 30 days. Measure which scored leads became opportunities and which didn't. Adjust. A working model beats a perfect one that never ships.

If you're looking to fill the top of your funnel with leads worth scoring, ConvertFleet's AI lead generation tools help you find verified B2B contacts with the firmographic data your scoring model needs—starting with our LinkedIn People scraper and Google Maps business extractor. Our Pro plan is free for the first 100 beta signups: 14 claimed, 86 left → Claim your spot.

SEO / publishing metadata

• Suggested URL: /blog/b2b-lead-scoring-criteria-75-point-icp-framework
• Internal links used: /blog/b2b-lead-generation-services-guide, /tools/linkedin-scraper, /blog/ai-lead-generation-tools-comparison, /tools/google-maps-scraper, /tools (implied), / (CTA)
• External authority links: Gartner State of B2B Sales Operations 2025 (referenced), Forrester 2024 (referenced), MarketingSherpa 2025 B2B Marketing Benchmarks (referenced), HubSpot 2024 Marketing Trends (referenced), MIT Lead Response Study 2024 (referenced)
• Image alt texts: See below

IMAGE PROMPTS

1. Hero image (16:9) - filename: hero-b2b-lead-scoring-criteria-75-point-icp-framework.png - alt: "Abstract visualization of a 75-point lead scoring framework with firmographic and behavioral segments" - prompt: "Clean modern flat vector illustration, professional SaaS-tech aesthetic, cool blue and slate palette with bright teal accent, soft gradients, generous negative space, rounded corners. A large circular gauge or radial chart dominates the center, filled 75% with color, showing '75 Points' subtly implied by the fill level. Around the gauge, two distinct segments are visualized: left side with building icons and person silhouettes representing firmographics, right side with cursor clicks and envelope icons representing behavior. No text baked into image, no real logos. 16:9 aspect ratio."

2. Inline diagram (16:9) - filename: b2b-lead-scoring-criteria-75-point-icp-framework-flow.png - alt: "Lead scoring workflow showing data input, point calculation, and threshold routing to sales or nurture" - prompt: "Clean modern flat vector illustration, professional SaaS-tech aesthetic, cool blue and slate palette with bright teal accent, soft gradients, generous negative space, rounded corners. A horizontal flow diagram with four connected nodes: 'Data Input' (magnifying glass over contact card), 'Score Calculation' (gear with numbers floating), 'Threshold Check' (gate with 75 marker), and 'Route' (two paths: one to a phone icon for sales, one to an envelope for nurture). Shapes are simple and geometric. No text baked into image, no real logos. 16:9 aspect ratio."

3. Inline comparison/checklist (16:9) - filename: b2b-lead-scoring-criteria-75-point-icp-framework-checklist.png - alt: "Visual checklist comparing positive and negative lead scoring attributes in two columns" - prompt: "Clean modern flat vector illustration, professional SaaS-tech aesthetic, cool blue and slate palette with bright teal accent for positive column and soft coral accent for negative column, generous negative space, rounded corners. Two vertical columns of simple icons with check marks. Left column: plus signs next to icons for demo request, webinar attendance, pricing download, company match. Right column: minus signs next to icons for bounced email, competitor domain, student email, careers page visit. No text baked into image, no real logos. 16:9 aspect ratio."

SCHEMA (JSON-LD)

```json { "@context": "https://schema.org", "@graph": [ { "@type": "BlogPosting", "mainEntityOfPage": { "@type": "WebPage", "@id": "https://convertfleet.online/blog/b2b-lead-scoring-criteria-75-point-icp-framework" }, "headline": "B2B Lead Scoring Criteria: The 75-Point ICP Framework (2026)", "description": "A practical 75-point B2B lead scoring criteria framework with firmographic and behavioral attributes, thresholds, and CRM-ready examples. Copy it directly.", "image": { "@id": "https://convertfleet.online/images/hero-b2b-lead-scoring-criteria-75-point-icp-framework.png" }, "author": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "Convertfleet Team", "url": "https://convertfleet.online" }, "publisher": { "@type": "Organization", "name": "ConvertFleet", "logo": { "@type": "ImageObject", "url": "https://convertfleet.online/logo.png" } }, "datePublished": "2026-06-14", "dateModified": "2026-06-14", "keywords": "b2b lead scoring criteria examples, b2b lead qualification framework, b2b lead scoring thresholds, b2b leads, lead scoring model, lead generation, b2b lead generation, lead generation services, lead generation agency, lead generation companies, what is lead generation, lead generation software, ai lead generation, b2b lead generation services, how to generate leads, lead generation marketing, lead generation strategies, lead generation tools, real estate lead generation, lead generation company, service business lead generation challenges, b2b lead generation agency, b2b lead generation companies" }, { "@type": "FAQPage", "mainEntity": [ { "@type": "Question", "name": "What is lead generation in marketing?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Lead generation in marketing is the systematic process of attracting and converting potential customers into prospects who have indicated interest in your offering. In B2B, this spans content marketing, paid channels, events, outbound outreach, and partner referrals—each producing leads at different cost points and intent levels that scoring models must discriminate." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How do I generate B2B leads?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Generate B2B leads by combining inbound content (SEO, webinars, whitepapers) with targeted outbound (LinkedIn, email, phone) and intent-based tactics (funding trigger alerts, job posting monitoring, technographic changes). Score all sources with the same framework to compare true quality, not just volume." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What is the best AI lead generation tool?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "The best AI lead generation tool depends on your stack and scale. Apollo.io suits outbound teams at $59/user/month. 6sense serves enterprise ABM at $2,000+/month. For flexible scraping and enrichment, ConvertFleet's tools integrate directly with this scoring framework. Evaluate based on data freshness, integration depth, and total cost of ownership—not feature lists." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How much does a lead generation tool cost?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "CRM-native scoring is free. Enrichment tools run $50–$200/user/month. Predictive platforms cost $2,000–$10,000/month. Most teams under $10M ARR should start with manual scoring and graduate to AI tools only after accumulating sufficient conversion data for algorithms to improve upon human judgment." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "What is the minimum viable lead scoring model for a 10-person sales team?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Start with firmographic fit (industry, company size, title) capped at 35 points and behavior (demo request, pricing page, email engagement) capped at 40. Set your sales threshold at 60. This simpler version of the 75-point framework takes under two hours to build and prevents SDRs from chasing unqualified leads." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "How often should I update my b2b lead scoring thresholds?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Review monthly for the first quarter after launch, then quarterly. Adjust thresholds if your SQL-to-opportunity rate falls below 15% or if SDRs report consistent pattern mismatches." } }, { "@type": "Question", "name": "Can I use this framework if I sell to multiple ICPs?", "acceptedAnswer": { "@type": "Answer", "text": "Yes. Create separate scoring matrices for each ICP with adjusted firmographic criteria, but keep the same 75-point threshold and behavior weights. Tag leads by ICP type so SDRs know which playbook to run." } } ] }, { "@type": "ImageObject", "contentUrl": "https://convertfleet.online/images/hero-b2b-lead-scoring-criteria-75-point-icp-framework.png", "caption": "Abstract visualization of a 75-point lead scoring framework with firmographic and behavioral segments", "width": 1200, "height": 675 } ] }